Flat sentences become challenging to determine when the subject suffers from brain-related complications. We can determine how or why brain-related injuries, illnesses, or mental conditions influence thinking. We can check also how actions through neuropsychological examinations can be effective. People who suffer from brain conditions struggle to comprehend their deeds and analyze their wrongfulness. Doing nothing different in sentencing people who have these brain issues leads to unfairness. They should receive different punishments compared to others who don’t have such issues.
A court system needs to examine brain health during the sentencing process. Conditions that lead to memory deficit, emotional instability, or brain injuries can impact each individual’s conduct. Medical specialists perform brain image assessments. They conduct memory and thinking exams and medical examinations to enable judges to determine appropriate sentencing.
Reports from the University of Virginia Forensic Clinic assist in such cases. The experts submit expert documents that prove how neurological conditions contributed to the person’s conduct. The information aids in the development of just sentences. Instead of receiving punishment, some individuals need professional treatment or therapy, as their medical condition deserves.
Unfair sentencing practices are harmful because all people differ from one another. Medical conditions affecting the brain need separate levels of legal judgment than people who understand their behavior. Neuropsychology serves as a necessary system to maintain fairness in legal proceedings. Insights about brain health function as a foundation to achieve equal judicial treatment for the entire population.